“One third of food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted globally.” (FAO, the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation). That is the equivalent of more than 1,000 cubic kilometres of freshwater abstracted per year, i.e. close to 25% of total estimated global withdrawals for human use in 2005. (2030 Water Resources Group, Charting our water future,
page 6) This is particularly important because water, and the rapidly
growing gap between withdrawals and sustainable supply, will be by far the most critical factor for global food supply security for the next 10-20 years.
About
one-third of today’s food losses occur in advanced economies and
two-thirds in developing countries (with lower per-capita waste but a
much higher share in global population).
What are the causes?
In developed economies,
waste is very much the result of prosperity. One-third of the overall
280-300 kg per capita of all food wasted and lost is actually thrown out
by consumers, with a negative underlying trend: in the United States
per capita food waste has increased approximately 50% since 1974 (this
figure comes from a somewhat unusual source, namely the US Government’s Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases).
According to the US Environmental Protection Agency,
discarded food represents the single largest component of total
municipal solid waste. Waste is also accentuated by at times exaggerated
“aesthetic” food standards set by governments and retailers (source FAO). “EU rules on misshapen fruit and veg were relaxed in 2009 but supermarkets still maintain private product standards.” (Source)
In emerging and developing economies,
food loss is the outcome of poverty, particularly a lack of
infrastructure and associated technical and managerial skills in food
production and post-harvest processing. In these countries, 95% of the
95-115 kg of food wasted per capita are lost and wasted before reaching
consumers.
Again, in many instances, trends seem to be negative too. There is no record of progress made towards the post-harvest loss reduction target set by the UN General Assembly in 1975. This report
by the organisation Business for Social Responsibility found that “in
many poorer countries, storage infrastructure, such as grain silos, is
worse than it was 30 years ago, the net result of reduced government
investment in agriculture.”
(Source)
Rapid urbanisation leads to extended supply chains, which requires more
rather than less investment in infrastructure. And without trying to be
complete: with more prosperity in emerging economies comes a “shift
towards vulnerable, shorter shelf-life items” (J. Parfitt et al., ‘Food
waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change
to 2050’, Royal Society August 2010).
Whenever strategies are
designed to bring freshwater withdrawals back into line with sustainable
supply, policies and initiatives to reverse negative trends and enable a
significant reduction in loss and waste of food must be included.
What can be done?
Let us start in advanced economies.
Farmers, traders, manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers should
carefully look at their supply chain and processes. A good example of
this is Food Waste Reduction Alliance (FWRA),
with its three major goals: (a) reduce waste wherever possible, (b)
increase donations of safe and nutritious food getting close to the
“best before” date, and (c) increase recycling of the remaining parts
where the first two goals do not succeed.
The very high waste of
products bought by consumers and then thrown away is also a question of
personal responsibility. In Europe and North America, 95-115 kg per year
of food per capita ends in waste baskets at home, compared to only 6-11
kg per capita per year in sub-Saharan Africa and South/Southeast Asia.
Industry and retail can help reduce this type of waste, for instance
with smaller portions or pack sizes.
In developing countries,
we must urgently improve the infrastructure. This will be a key item on
the agenda of the G20 meeting of heads of state and government in
Australia this year. As a consequence, the business-driven B20 – the aim
of which is to contribute ideas for the gathering of the government
leaders – selected investment in infrastructure as the priority for one
of the five taskforces.
For this group, at Nestlé we estimated an
investment of USD 2.5-3 trillion in emerging/developing economies will
be needed over the period 2005-2050, for cold and dry post-harvest
storage, rural roads, wholesale market facilities and first-stage
processing (estimate based on FAO data). This is high, but seems affordable.
Again,
there is also a role for industry. First by reducing any remaining
waste in operations, but also by contributing to the modernisation of
the food supply chain, in view of the increasing number of people living
in cities with a population of more than 1 million and the ever-longer
distances between farm and consumers’ dinner tables.
Let me illustrate the potential impact of more industry involvement with a product I know particularly well, namely milk. Studies by the FAO
show an 18% loss in traditional fresh milk supply chains to urban
centres in developing countries, due to spillage and spoilage. Depending
on the season, these losses can be up to 50% due to forced consumption,
because dairy farmers are unable to reach their urban buyers.
In
comparison: losses in our Nestlé supply chain from milk farmers to
retail outlet are below 0.6%, for instance in the climatic conditions of
Pakistan and over very long distances. There, the milk-shed where we
collect milk from smallholder farmers extends over an area with a total
surface twice the size of Switzerland.
Traditional transportation of milk
And
then there is packaging (rather unpopular in parts of Western
societies): "Food wastage in less-developed regions … with good
packaging it is rarely more than 2-3%.” (Source)
Please comment
I
am sure there are many more solutions and more issues that need to be
addressed in order to reverse the trend towards increasing food loss and
waste. I am looking forward to your comments and ideas.
No comments:
Post a Comment